Today: Last Update:

  • CAS Decision in the Arbitration Procedure Between Worawi Makudi and FIFA: Sanction Reduced


    Lausanne, 12 February 2019 - The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) has issued its decision in the
    appeal arbitration procedure between Mr Worawi Makudi, former President of the Football
    Association of Thailand (FAT) (2007-2015) and former member of the Executive Committee of the
    Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) (1997-2015), and FIFA.

    In 2016, following an investigation into the revision of the statutes of the FAT, the Adjudicatory
    Chamber of the FIFA Ethics Committee issued a decision in which Mr Makudi was found to have
    infringed article 17 (forgery and falsification) and article 41 (obligation of the parties to collaborate)
    of the FIFA Code of Ethics. It imposed a ban from taking part in any kind of football-related activity
    at national and international level for a period of five years and a fine of CHF 10,000. Mr Makudi
    appealed such decision to the FIFA Appeal Committee which reduced the ban to three years and six
    months and maintained the fine at CHF 10,000.

    Mr Makudi filed an appeal against the FIFA Appeal Committee decision at CAS. In the decision issued
    today, the CAS Panel in charge of this matter considered that, on the basis of the evidence available
    before the CAS, Worawi Makudi did not breach Article 17 of the FIFA Code of Ethics. The breach of
    article 41 of the FIFA Code of Ethics was confirmed, but to a lesser degree than found by the FIFA
    instances. Accordingly, the CAS Panel found the appropriate sanctions to be a reprimand and a fine of
    CHF 5,000 and cancelled the ban from taking part in any football-related activity.

    The CAS Panel noted that Mr Makudi had presented additional witnesses and new information during
    the CAS proceedings which was not available to the FIFA instances that issued the previous decisions.
    The additional evidence presented was important for the outcome of the case and the CAS Panel
    emphasized that Mr Makudi contributed to the fact that three instances were necessary to solve this
    matter because he failed to call certain witnesses in the proceedings before the FIFA instances, thereby
    depriving these bodies from the evidence available to CAS, which could have resulted in different
    decisions of the Adjudicatory Chamber and the FIFA Appeal Committee. As a consequence, the CAS
    Panel did not grant any costs to Mr Makudi, although he was successful in part in this appeal procedure.


    As a service to our readers, Around the Rings will provide verbatim texts of selected press releases issued by Olympic-related organizations, federations, businesses and sponsors.

    These press releases appear as sent to Around the Rings and are not edited for spelling, grammar or punctuation. 

    25 Years at #1: Your best source of news about the Olympics is, for subscribers only