CAS Media Release - WADA v. Sun Yang & FINA
SUN YANG IS FOUND GUILTY OF A DOPING OFFENSE AND SANCTIONED WITH AN 8-YEAR PERIOD OF INELIGIBILITY
Lausanne, 28 February 2020 - The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) has upheld the appeal filed
by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) against the Chinese swimmer Sun Yang and the
Fédération Internationale de Natation (FINA). As a consequence, Sun Yang (the Athlete) is sanctioned
with an eight-year period of ineligibility, starting on the date of the CAS award.
Following a conflictual anti-doping test at the residence of Sun Yang in September 2018 which resulted
in the testing not being completed, the matter was initially referred to the FINA Doping Panel
(FINA DP) which found that the International Standard for Testing and Investigations (ISTI), the
protocol adopted by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) for the conduct of doping controls, had
not been properly followed. Therefore, the FINA DP invalidated the sample collection. As a
consequence, the FINA DP determined that the athlete had not committed an anti-doping rule
WADA filed an appeal at CAS against that decision, asserting that Sun Yang had voluntarily refused
to submit to sample collection and requesting that a period of ineligibility between a minimum 2 years
and maximum 8 years be imposed on him.
The arbitration on appeal was referred to a panel of CAS arbitrators, composed of Judge Franco Frattini
(Italy), President, Mr Romano F. Subiotto QC (Belgium/UK) and Prof. Philippe Sands QC (UK),
which held a hearing on 15 November 2019. Further to the parties’ request, the hearing was conducted
The CAS Panel unanimously determined, to its comfortable satisfaction, that the Athlete violated
Article 2.5 FINA DC (Tampering with any part of Doping Control). In particular, the Panel found that
the personnel in charge of the doping control complied with all applicable requirements as set out in
the ISTI. More specifically, the Athlete failed to establish that he had a compelling justification to
destroy his sample collection containers and forego the doping control when, in his opinion, the
collection protocol was not in compliance with the ISTI. As the Panel noted, it is one thing, having
provided a blood sample, to question the accreditation of the testing personnel while keeping the intact
samples in the possession of the testing authorities; it is quite another thing, after lengthy exchanges
and warnings as to the consequences, to act in such a way that results in destroying the sample
containers, thereby eliminating any chance of testing the sample at a later stage.
Considering that, in June 2014, the Athlete was found guilty of a first anti-doping rule violation
(ADRV), the Panel concluded that, in accordance with Article 10.7.1 FINA DC, an eight-year period
of ineligibility, starting on the date of the CAS award, has to be imposed on the Athlete for this second
Considering 1) that FINA refrained from seeking the imposition of a provisional suspension on the
Athlete when charging him with an anti-doping rule violation, 2) that doping tests performed on the
Athlete shortly before and after the aborted doping control in September 2018 were negative, and
3) that in the absence of any evidence that the Athlete may have engaged in doping activity since
4 September 2018, including on the occasion of the FINA World Championships in Gwangju, South
Korea in July 2019, the results achieved by the Athlete in the period prior to the CAS award being
issued should not be disqualified.
The Arbitral Award will be published on the CAS website in a few days, unless the parties agree that
it should remain confidential.
As a service to our readers, Around the Rings will provide verbatim texts of selected press releases issued by Olympic-related organizations, federations, businesses and sponsors.
These press releases appear as sent to Around the Rings and are not edited for spelling, grammar or punctuation.
Your best source of news about the Olympics is www.aroundtherings.com, for subscribers only